Aller au menu Aller au contenu
Recruitment
Laboratory of Grenoble for sciences of conception, optimisation and production
Recruitment
Recruitment

> GSCOP-Recruiting > GSCOP-Theses

Analysis and feasibility study of urban pooling: characteristics, competencies and conditions for performance

Supervisor Name : Marie-Laure Espinouse (Laboratoire G-SCOP) et Karine Evrard Samuel (Laboratoire CERAG)
Doctoral School : I-MEP2, Grenoble
Start Date  : 1/10/2015
Financing - Context - Partnerships: Financement demandé à l’ARC8 -

Positioning and Challenges:

Scientific and regional context

Urban logistics recovers any service contributing to an optimized management of flows in urban zones (Dablanc, 2006). It concerns the delivery of goods in the center of urban and dense areas, their delivery to the final customer (last kilometer) as well as return flows. Urban logistics implies the development of innovative services, but also mainly the conception of new organizations for the multiple implicated stakeholders. It includes numerous activities including transport, storage, packaging, order management, and pallet returns, home delivery, relay delivery, which are at the origin of new solutions since the practices of consumption evolve and the demand of services increases (Evrard Samuel et Cung, 2014). Due to environmental and economic pressures, urban logistics appears from now on as a major issue in cities and predict numerous changes for the coming years: the city, considered as the last stage of a multi-actors supply chain, has to absorb an increasing flow of goods, what generates multiple pollutions (congestion, noise, security, etc.). Neither the elected members, nor the companies can ignore the impact of urban logistics on the economic attractiveness of territories.

Several solutions of urban logistics are in project or currently experimented by several European cities to improve the transportation of goods, for example the implementation of UDC (Urban Distribution Center) (Morana and Gonzalez-Feliu, 2011), new regulations such as regulated zones or extended delivery schedules (Pumas project), the use of alternative transport. In order to catch the best advantage of these solutions, optimize the truck load and decrease the above-cited pollutions, consolidation (or also called pooling) is considered as a prerequisite. Several schemes of consolidation can be considered: flow’s consolidation, storage’s consolidation for example with the use of ULB (Urban Logistic Boxes), packaging and pallet returns, etc. The topic of this thesis concerns the flow and warehouse pooling. The objective is to analyze the opportunity and the impact of one or several logistic shared spaces where several stakeholders share a physical space and logistics information to improve the global performance of the overall distribution processes. Pooling could help to improve the quality of life in city centers by decreasing up to 70% of kilometers traveled by trucks to assume the last kilometer (Thompson and Hassal, 2012) and by decreasing the CO2 emissions by 20 % to 50 % (Pan, 2010).

Pooling is a topical subject just as well for economic actors (Cluster logistique, 2014), as for academic considering the increasing number of publications on that topic since the last few years: implementation study of an UDC in Barcelona (Roca-Riu and Estrada, 2012), impact study of flexibility in horizontal collaborations (Vanovermeire and Sörensen, 2014), a study of urban logistics consolidation for the last kilometer in Singapore (De Souza et al., 2014), a study of consolidation of flows in Lyon (Gonzalez-Feliu and Salanova, 2012), a study on warehouse pooling establishing a typology (Makaci et al., 2014) and a recently defended thesis on the role of the logistics services provider in the emergence of pooling strategies (Michon, 2014).


This thesis positions itself on one hand in the line of the thesis of Mourad Makaci supervised by Professors Evrard Samuel and Bottaz-Genoulaz, concerning the characterization of warehouse pooling, and on the other hand in the studies developed by the URBADIS project which concerns both transportation and warehousing issues for urban distribution.

The aim of this thesis is the conception of an innovative urban logistics proposing pooling solutions. Consolidation of flows supposes a real change of paradigm with an implication and a strong collaboration of the various actors from economic and social world and from local authorities. Furthermore, this thesis will be included in the ULIS (Urban Logistics: Integrated Solutions) project. The objective of this project is to develop an integrated approach to combine various existing urban logistics solutions to imagine a more innovative organization of the city center, integrating all type of flows (physical -goods and people-, informative and financial).

Approach and expected results

This thesis will begin with a state of art on urban logistics issues tied with pooling activities. This research will focus on effective solutions of transport and storage to improve the last kilometer delivery. Existing experiments of consolidation will be studied to identify the success’ and failures’ sources.

Simultaneously, a field study will be conducted to identify and map the various types of flows. The field of experiment will be Grenoble Metropole. For this part, the PhD student will lean from existing partnerships and collaborations created within the current projects in progress. During this field study, the various existing logistic solutions will be listed.

Once this inventory and state of art will be realized, the various possibilities of pooling will have to be formulated and their impacts on pollution (congestion, emissions) will have to be estimated by simulation.

Various proposed solutions of urban pooling will be analyzed and optimized. Their financial and organizational feasibility will be evaluated considering their attractiveness for the various actors.

Finally, the interactions between urban pooling and regulatory measures will be analyzed and expressed by scenarios.

Références

Cluster logistique (2014), la mutualisation en logistique entre mythe et réalité, http://www.clusterlogistique-ra.com/2014/11/14/communique-de-presse-la-mutualisation-en-logistique-entre-mythe-et-realites/

Dablanc L. (2006). Goods transport in large European cities: difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41 (3), 280–285.

De Souza R., Goh M., Lau H.C. Ng W.S., Tan P.S., (2014) Collaborative Urban Logistics-Synchronizing the Last Mile A Singapore Research Perspective, Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 125, 422-431

Evrard Samuel K., Cung V.D. (2014). Analyse comparée des solutions de logistique urbaine, 3ème Colloque de Logistique Urbaine, Nantes, France.

Gonzalez-Feliu J., Salanova J.M. (2012), Defining and evaluating collaborative urban freight transportation systems, Procedia Social and Behavorial Sciences, 39, 172-183.

Makaci M., Reaidy P., Evrard Samuel K., Botta-Genoulaz V., Monteiro T. (2014), La mutualisation des entrepôts dans la chaîne logistique : proposition d’un cadre d’analyse, 10th International Congress of Logistics Research, RIRL 2014, Marseille.

Michon V. (2014), Le rôle du prestataire de services logistiques dans l’émergence des cas de mutualisation logistique concertée : application à la relation industrie - grande distribution alimentaire en France, thèse de doctorat, Aix-Marseille Université, laboratoire CRET-LOG.

Morana J., Gonzalez-Feliu (2011). Le transport vert de marchandises : l’expérience de la ville de Padoue en Italie, Gestion, 36(2), 18-26

Pan S. (2010). Contribution À La Définition et À L’évaluation de La Mutualisation de Chaînes Logistiques Pour Réduire Les Émissions de CO2 Du transport : Application Au Cas de La Grande Distribution, thèse de doctorat, Business administration, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.  

Projet PUMAS : http://www.lyon.cci.fr/site/cms/36960/Projet-europeen-PUMAS--ameliorer-les-livraisons-en-centre-ville

Roca-Riu M. Estrada M. (2012), An evaluation of urban consolidation centers through logistics systems analysis in circumstances where companies have equal market shares, Procedia Social an Behavorial Sciences, 39, 796-806.

Thompson R.G., Hassal K.P.(2012), A collaborative urban distribution network, Procedia Social Bahavioral Sciences, 39, 230-240.

Vanovermeire C., Sörensen K. (2014), Measuring and rewarding flexibility in collaborative distribution, including two-partner coalitions, European Journal of Operational Research, 239, 157-165



Contact(s) :

Marie-Laure Espinouse
Laboratoire G-SCOP

Mail :
Marie-Laure.Espinouse@g-scop.grenoble-inp.fr
Tel.: 00 33 4 56 52 89 26

Karine Evrard Samuel
Laboratoire CERAG

Mail:
karine.samuel@grenoble-inp.fr
Tel: 00 33 4 76 57 48 88

Cluster logistique (2014), la mutualisation en logistique entre mythe et réalité, http://www.clusterlogistique-ra.com/2014/11/14/communique-de-presse-la-mutualisation-en-logistique-entre-mythe-et-realites/
Dablanc L. (2006). Goods transport in large European cities: difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41 (3), 280–285.
De Souza R., Goh M., Lau H.C. Ng W.S., Tan P.S., (2014) Collaborative Urban Logistics-Synchronizing the Last Mile A Singapore Research Perspective, Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 125, 422-431.
Evrard Samuel K., Cung V.D. (2014). Analyse comparée des solutions de logistique urbaine, 3ème Colloque de Logistique Urbaine, Nantes, France.
Gonzalez-Feliu J., Salanova J.M. (2012), Defining and evaluating collaborative urban freight transportation systems, Procedia Social and Behavorial Sciences, 39, 172-183.
Makaci M., Reaidy P., Evrard Samuel K., Botta-Genoulaz V., Monteiro T. (2014), La mutualisation des entrepôts dans la chaîne logistique : proposition d’un cadre d’analyse, 10th International Congress of Logistics Research, RIRL 2014, Marseille.
Michon V. (2014), Le rôle du prestataire de services logistiques dans l’émergence des cas de mutualisation logistique concertée : application à la relation industrie - grande distribution alimentaire en France, thèse de doctorat, Aix-Marseille Université, laboratoire CRET-LOG.
Morana J., Gonzalez-Feliu (2011). Le transport vert de marchandises : l’expérience de la ville de Padoue en Italie, Gestion, 36(2), 18-26.
Pan S. (2010). Contribution À La Définition et À L’évaluation de La Mutualisation de Chaînes Logistiques Pour Réduire Les Émissions de CO2 Du transport : Application Au Cas de La Grande Distribution, thèse de doctorat, Business administration, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.
Projet PUMAS : http://www.lyon.cci.fr/site/cms/36960/Projet-europeen-PUMAS--ameliorer-les-livraisons-en-centre-ville
Roca-Riu M. Estrada M. (2012), An evaluation of urban consolidation centers through logistics systems analysis in circumstances where companies have equal market shares, Procedia Social an Behavorial Sciences, 39, 796-806.
Thompson R.G., Hassal K.P. (2012), A collaborative urban distribution network, Procedia Social Bahavioral Sciences, 39, 230-240.
Vanovermeire C., Sörensen K. (2014), Measuring and rewarding flexibility in collaborative distribution, including two-partner coalitions, European Journal of Operational Research, 239, 157-165.

Contact(s)
:

Marie-Laure Espinouse
Laboratoire G-SCOP
Mail : Marie-Laure.Espinouse@g-scop.grenoble-inp.fr
Tel.: 00 33 4 56 52 89 26

Karine Evrard Samuel
Laboratoire CERAG
Mail: karine.samuel@grenoble-inp.fr
Tel: 00 33 4 76 57 48 88

Date of update May 7, 2015

Univ. Grenoble Alpes