Grenoble - France
If "Other", could you explain ?
Which one ?
Q4. Have you encountered any difficulty to improve these points ? If yes, which one ?
Q5. Which practices did you gain when writing a peer-journal paper? For example, structure of paper, explanation of the theoretical gap...Would you be now able to implement them in another context? Would you be able to and explain them to your community?
Q6. After going through the different steps following the workshop (reworking and submitting the paper), do you have any suggestions on how to enrich the content of the PUBLISH-ED Workshop in the future ?
Spam robots, please fill in this field. Humans should leave it blank.
Input validation (*)Listen to the word to enter
Date of update November 13, 2015