> GSCOP_RESSOURCES > GSCOP-Logiciels
Q1. What did you do with your paper since last February 2012 ? Did you (Multi reply is possible)
Publish it ?
Submit it ?
Rework it ?
Put it aside ? (no time )
Bury it ? (too busy)
If "Other", could you explain ?
Q2. In which journal did you submit your paper or would you like to do so ?
The same journal than your journal track of the Workshop
An other journal :
Which one ?
Q3. If you have reworked your workshop paper, did you precisely know which points must be absolutely improved to meet the requirements of the targeted journal ? (4 levels of scale) :
4= Yes, I perfectly knew these points and had no difficulty to implement them
3= I thought I understood after the workshop but I was not so easy to implement these points
2= I think I didn’t quite understand which points must be improved
1= I have no idea
Q4. Have you encountered any difficulty to improve these points ? If yes, which one ?
Q5. Which practices did you gain when writting a peer-journal paper, would you be now able to implement them and explain them? For example, structure of paper, explanation of the theoretical gap :
Q6. After going through the different steps following the workshop (reworking and submitting the paper), do you have any suggestions on how to enrich the content of the PUBLISH-ED Workshop in the future ?
Champ pour les robots. Si vous êtes humains, merci de le laisser vide.
mise à jour le 18 décembre 2013